UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Rodulfo ROBLERO LOPEZ, aka Rodulfo Roblero, aka Rodulofo Roblero, aka Rudulfo Roblero-Lopez, Defendant-Appellant.
Decided: July 16, 2020
Before: CANBY, FRIEDLAND, and R. NELSON, Circuit Judges.
Christina Marie Cabanillas, Assistant U.S. Attorney, USTU- Office of the US Attorney, Tucson, AZ, for Plaintiff-Appellee Rodulfo Roblero Lopez, Pro Se
In these consolidated appeals, Rodulfo Roblero Lopez appeals from his guilty-plea conviction and 24-month sentence for reentry of a removed alien, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326, and the revocation of supervised release and consecutive 8-month sentence imposed upon revocation. Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), Roblero Lopez's counsel has filed a brief stating that there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. We have provided Roblero Lopez the opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed.
Roblero Lopez waived his right to appeal his conviction, the revocation of supervised release, and his sentences. Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), discloses no arguable issue as to the validity of the waivers. See United States v. Watson, 582 F.3d 974, 986-88 (9th Cir. 2009). We accordingly dismiss these appeals. See id. at 988.
Counsel's motion to withdraw is GRANTED.
Was this helpful?
Response sent, thank you
Welcome to FindLaw's Cases & Codes
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.