Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL TRUST COMPANY, TRUSTEE FOR the GSAA TRUST MORTGAGE PASS-THROUGH CERTIFICATES, SERIES 2006-8, Plaintiff-counter-defendant-Appellant, v.
TALASERA AND VICANTO HOMEOWNERS’ ASSOCIATION; SFR Investments Pool 1, LLC, Defendants-Appellees, v. Nationstar Mortgage LLC; Bank of America, NA, Cross-defendants-Appellants.
MEMORANDUM ***
Deutsche Bank National Trust Company as Trustee for the GSAA Trust Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2006-8, Nationstar Mortgage, LLC, and Bank of America, N.A. (collectively referred to as the “Banks”), appeal the district court's grant of summary judgment for SFR Investments Pool 1, LLC (SFR) and Talasera & Vicanto Homeowners’ Association (the HOA). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291.
Because the district court disposed of this case on cross-motions for summary judgment, we may review the district court's denial of the Banks’ motion for summary judgment. See Redevelopment Agency of Stockton v. BNSF Ry. Co., 643 F.3d 668, 672 (9th Cir. 2011). Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to SFR and the HOA, the evidence establishes that Bank of America's tender satisfied the superpriority portion of the HOA's lien.1 The tender was valid, even though it was conditional, because Bank of America “had a legal right to insist” on the condition included in its tender offer. Diamond Spur, 427 P.3d at 118. Because the Banks’ notice of appeal and opening brief clearly indicated that the Banks were appealing the district court's order granting summary judgment for the HOA, the Banks did not waive that claim. See Le v. Astrue, 558 F.3d 1019, 1022–24 (9th Cir. 2009). Therefore, the district court erred in not granting the Banks summary judgment on the quiet title claim. See Arlington West, 920 F.3d at 623.2
REVERSED.
FOOTNOTES
1. When the district court ruled, it did not have the benefit of the Nevada Supreme Court's decision in Bank of America, N.A. v. SFR Investments Pool 1, LLC, 134 Nev. 604, 427 P.3d 113 (2018) (en banc) (“Diamond Spur”), and our decision in Bank of America, N.A. v. Arlington West Twilight Homeowners Association, 920 F.3d 620, 623 (9th Cir. 2019) (“Arlington West”), which held that the holder of a first deed of trust can preserve its interest by tendering “the superpriority portion of the HOA's lien,” which “consists of nine months of unpaid HOA dues and any unpaid charges for maintenance and nuisance abatement,” Arlington West, 920 F.3d at 623 (citing Diamond Spur, 427 P.3d at 117–18).
2. Because we reverse the district court's ruling on these grounds, we do not reach the Banks’ other arguments.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: No. 17-16568
Decided: July 16, 2020
Court: United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)