Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Karim KHOJA, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. PROVINCE, INC., as the Wind Down Administrator for Orexigen Therapeutics, Inc.; Joseph P. Hagan; Michael A. Narachi; Preston Klassen, Defendants-Appellees.
MEMORANDUM ***
On August 13, 2018, we filed our opinion in this case, Khoja v. Orexigen Therapeutics Inc., 899 F.3d 988 (9th Cir. 2018), cert. denied, sub nom. Hagan v. Khoja, ––– U.S. ––––, 139 S. Ct. 2615, 204 L.Ed.2d 264 (2019). Because, during the pendancy of this appeal, Orexigen filed a voluntary Chapter 11 petition, and the automatic stay of 11 U.S.C. § 362(a) came into effect, we noted that that “opinion [did] not address or decide Plaintiff’s appeal as against defendant-appellee Orexigen.” Id. at 994 n.1.
Orexigen’s successor in interest, Province, Inc., as the Wind Down Administrator for Orexigen Therapeutics Inc.,1 has now filed a status report indicating that the bankruptcy court, per the parties’ stiuplation, has lifted the § 362 stay with respect to this case. We have therefore resubmitted this appeal for decision with respect to Orexigen.2
We have, again, reviewed the parties’ briefs and our opinion in Orexigen. After such review, we fully adopt our opinion in Orexigen, 899 F.3d 988, to resolve Plaintiff’s appeal as against Defendant Orexigen.
Therefore, with respect to Plaintiff’s appeal as against Defendant-Appellee Province, Inc., as the Wind Down Administrator for Orexigen Therapeutics, Inc., the judgment of the district court is
AFFIRMED in part, REVERSED in part, and REMANDED. No costs.
FOOTNOTES
1. For convenience, we refer to Orexigen’s successor, the Wind Down Administrator, as “Orexigen.”
2. We note that Orexigen fully participated in the briefing and oral argument on November 6, 2017; the § 362 stay did not come into effect until after oral argument and submission of the case for decision. See id.
Response sent, thank you
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: No. 16-56069
Decided: May 19, 2020
Court: United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
FindLaw for Legal Professionals
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)