Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
James R. HEFFLIN; Patti A. Hefflin, Petitioners-Appellants, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent-Appellee.
MEMORANDUM **
James R. Hefflin and Patti A. Hefflin appeal pro se from the Tax Court's summary judgment for the Commissioner of Internal Revenue in the Hefflins’ petition seeking review of the Internal Revenue Service Appeals Office's determination upholding the filing of a notice of federal tax lien. We have jurisdiction under 26 U.S.C. § 7482(a)(1). We review de novo. Miller v. Comm'r, 310 F.3d 640, 642 (9th Cir. 2002). We affirm.
The Tax Court properly granted summary judgment for the Commissioner because petitioners failed to raise a genuine dispute of material fact as to whether the IRS Appeals Office abused its discretion in determining that the notice of federal tax lien was not erroneously filed. See 26 C.F.R. § 301.6159–1(f)(3)(i)(B) (actions the IRS may take with regard to liability identified in an installment agreement includes filing a notice of federal tax lien); Fargo v. Comm'r, 447 F.3d 706, 709 (9th Cir. 2006) (discussing standard of review).
We reject as unsupported by the record the Hefflins’ contentions regarding retaliation and violation of their due process rights.
We do not consider the Hefflins’ contentions regarding the existence or amount of the underlying tax liability. See Comm'r v. McCoy, 484 U.S. 3, 6, 108 S.Ct. 217, 98 L.Ed.2d 2 (1987) (court of appeals lacks jurisdiction to decide an issue not before the Tax Court or to grant relief beyond the powers of the Tax Court); see also 26 U.S.C. § 6330(c)(2)(B) (taxpayer may challenge existence or amount of underlying tax liability only if taxpayer did not otherwise have an opportunity to dispute such liability), § 6330(c)(4) (taxpayer may not raise issues at a collection due process hearing already considered at a prior hearing).
AFFIRMED.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: No. 18-72551
Decided: March 10, 2020
Court: United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)