Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Brent JACKSON, Petitioner-Appellant, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent-Appellee.
MEMORANDUM **
Brent Jackson appeals pro se from the Tax Court's order dismissing for failure to state a claim his petition challenging the Commissioner of Internal Revenue's notice of tax deficiency for the 2011 tax year. We have jurisdiction under 26 U.S.C. § 7482(a)(1). We review de novo. Grimes v. Comm'r, 806 F.2d 1451, 1453 (9th Cir. 1986). We affirm.
The Tax Court properly dismissed Jackson's petition for failure to state a claim because Jackson failed to set forth “a clear and concise assignment” of error or any facts demonstrating error in the Commissioner's determinations. T.C.R. 36(b)(4); Urban v. Comm'r, 964 F.2d 888, 889-890 (9th Cir. 1992) (noting that the requirements of the Internal Revenue Manual are “not mandatory”); Hughes v. United States, 953 F.2d 531, 536 (9th Cir. 1992) (explaining that “[t]he delegation of authority down the chain of command, from the Secretary, to the Commissioner of Internal Revenue, to local IRS employees constitutes a valid delegation by the Secretary to the Commissioner, and a redelegation by the Commissioner to the delegated officers and employees”); see also United States v. Hanson, 2 F.3d 942, 945 (9th Cir. 1993) (rejecting the argument that a natural born citizen of a state is not subject to the tax code); United States v. Buras, 633 F.2d 1356, 1361 (9th Cir. 1980) (explaining that “the Sixteenth Amendment is broad enough to grant Congress the power to collect an income tax regardless of the source of the taxpayer's income”).
We do not consider matters not specifically and distinctly raised and argued in the opening brief. See Padgett v. Wright, 587 F.3d 983, 985 n.2 (9th Cir. 2009).
Jackson's motion to take judicial notice (Docket Entry No. 10) is denied as moot. Jackson's motion to correct his address and the case caption (Docket Entry No. 11) is granted in part to update his current mailing address on file with the court but denied in all other respects. Jackson's request for an evidentiary hearing, set forth in the opening brief, is denied.
AFFIRMED.
Response sent, thank you
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: No. 18-71248
Decided: March 10, 2020
Court: United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
FindLaw for Legal Professionals
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)