Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Steven Anthony QUINTANA, aka Lil Slugger, aka Slugger, Defendant-Appellant.
MEMORANDUM **
Steven Anthony Quintana pled guilty to possession with the intent to distribute methamphetamine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1), (b)(1)(B). Because Quintana had two prior convictions for possession of methamphetamine for sale under California Health and Safety Code § 11378, Quintana was subject to a ten-year mandatory minimum sentence under 21 U.S.C. § 841(b)(1)(B) and the career offender sentencing enhancement under U.S.S.G. § 4B1.1. In 2017, the district court sentenced Quintana to 180-months in prison followed by eight years of supervised release, which Quintana now appeals. We have jurisdiction under 18 U.S.C. § 3742(a) and 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We vacate Quintana’s sentence and remand for resentencing.
1. If sentenced under the First Step Act of 2018, Pub. L. No. 115-391, 132 Stat. 519, Quintana would not have been subject to a ten-year mandatory minimum sentence previously mandated under 21 U.S.C. § 841(b)(1)(B). See First Step Act § 401(a)(1)–(2). We therefore remand for the district court to consider in the first instance whether the First Step Act applies to Quintana, who was sentenced prior to its enactment, and, if so, to resentence Quintana accordingly. See Wheeler v. United States, ––– U.S. ––––, 139 S. Ct. 2664, 2664, 204 L.Ed.2d 1067 (2019) (“Judgment vacated, and case remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit for the court to consider the First Step Act of 2018.”). On remand, the district court is free to reopen and review all sentencing issues and to consider the effect, if any, of this Court’s opinion in [United States v. Gamboa, 19-50014]; see also United States v. McFalls, 675 F.3d 599, 604 (6th Cir. 2012) (“Under 28 U.S.C. § 2106, courts of appeals may issue either general or limited remands. A general remand permits the district court to redo the entire sentencing process, including considering new evidence and issues.”) (internal citations omitted).
2. Also, before the Court is Appellant’s unopposed motion to take judicial notice of certain conviction records. D.I. 13. We hereby grant this motion.
VACATED AND REMANDED.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: No. 17-50416
Decided: February 10, 2020
Court: United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)