Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
METROPCS GEORGIA, LLC, a Delaware corporation, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jad DEA, an individual, Defendant-Appellant, Metro Dealer, Inc., a Florida corporation; Mobile USA, Inc., a Florida corporation, Defendants.
MEMORANDUM **
Jad Dea appeals pro se from the district court's order granting a preliminary injunction in MetroPCS Georgia LLC's diversity action against Dea. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1292(a)(1). We review de novo questions of our own jurisdiction, Hunt v. Imperial Merchant Servs., Inc., 560 F.3d 1137, 1140 (9th Cir. 2009), and we dismiss this appeal as moot.
The district court's April 15, 2019 order granting a preliminary injunction against Dea specified that the injunction would “remain in effect for six months, or until the trial on this matter, whichever comes first.” The six-month injunction period has expired and MetroPCS Georgia LLC has not sought to renew the injunction. Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal as moot. See Am. Tunaboat Ass'n v. Brown, 67 F.3d 1404, 1407 (9th Cir. 1995) (“A case is moot if it has lost its character as a present, live controversy. We cannot take jurisdiction over a claim as to which no relief can be granted.” (citations omitted)); see also Shell Offshore Inc. v. Greenpeace, Inc., 815 F.3d 623, 628 (9th Cir. 2016) (dismissing as moot an appeal of preliminary injunction where the injunction expired and the plaintiff did not seek to renew the injunction; explaining that this court's “jurisdiction [in such appeals] hinges on whether the parties have a continued, legally cognizable interest in the validity of the injunction”).
DISMISSED.
Response sent, thank you
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: No. 19-35402
Decided: January 14, 2020
Court: United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
FindLaw for Legal Professionals
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)