Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
EARTH ISLAND INSTITUTE; Sequoia Forestkeeper, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Kevin ELLIOTT, in his official capacity as Forest Supervisor of the Sequoia National Forest; United States Forest Service, Defendants-Appellees, Sierra Forest Products, Intervenor-Defendant-Appellee.
MEMORANDUM *
Appellants Earth Island Institute and Sequoia Forestkeeper (collectively, “Earth Island”) appeal the district court's order granting summary judgment to the United States Forest Service and other defendants.
The parties agree that this case is moot unless the “capable of repetition, yet evading review” exception applies. See Matter of Bunker Ltd. Partnership, 820 F.2d 308, 312 (9th Cir. 1987). The exception does not apply because Earth Island could have sought a stay of the challenged tree removal activities pending appeal in this case and can still seek a stay of such activities in two similar pending cases. Where a “prompt application for a stay pending appeal can preserve an issue for appeal, the issue is not one that will evade review.” Headwaters, Inc. v. Bureau of Land Mgmt., 893 F.2d 1012, 1016 (9th Cir. 1989) (quoting Am. Horse Protection Ass'n, Inc. v. Watt, 679 F.2d 150, 151 (9th Cir. 1982) (per curiam)). Earth Island's reliance on Alaska Ctr. for Env't v. U.S. Forest Serv., 189 F.3d 851 (9th Cir. 1999), and Alcoa, Inc. v. Bonneville Power Admin., 698 F.3d 774 (9th Cir. 2012), is misplaced because in those cases, a stay or injunction would not have preserved the issue for appeal.1
DISMISSED AS MOOT.
FOOTNOTES
1. Earth Island's motion to take judicial notice of court documents filed in related cases (Docket Entry No. 36) is GRANTED.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: No. 18-16354
Decided: August 14, 2019
Court: United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)