Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. John TURNQUIST, Defendant-Appellant.
MEMORANDUM ** and ORDER
Federal prisoner John Turnquist appeals from the district court’s denial of his petition for a writ of habeas corpus. We review de novo the district court’s denial of Turnquist’s petition, Stephens v. Herrera, 464 F.3d 895, 897 (9th Cir. 2006), and we affirm.
The First Step Act of 2018, Pub. L. No. 115-391, 132 Stat. 5194, includes an amendment to 18 U.S.C. § 3624(b) – the good time credit provision – providing federal prisoners the possibility of seven additional days of good time credit per year. § 102(b), 132 Stat. at 5210. Turnquist argues that this amendment took effect upon the Act’s enactment on December 21, 2018, and, therefore, requires the Bureau of Prisons to immediately re-calculate his sentence, which would accelerate his projected release date and consequently his transfer to a community corrections facility.
However, our decision filed today in Bottinelli v. Salazar, No. 19-35201, 929 F.3d 1196, 2019 WL 3071298 (9th Cir. 2019), resolves this issue. There, we held that the Act’s good time credit amendment was not immediately effective upon enactment but will become so with the establishment of the “risk and needs assessment system” on July 19, 2019 – 210 days after the Act’s enactment. See §§ 101(a), 102(b), 132 Stat. at 5196-97, 5213. For the reasons explained in Bottinelli, we affirm the denial of Turnquist’s habeas petition.1
AFFIRMED.
FOOTNOTES
1. We grant Turnquist’s unopposed request for judicial notice. Dkt. No. 20.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: No. 19-15641
Decided: July 15, 2019
Court: United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)