Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jaime VILLA, Defendant-Appellant.
MEMORANDUM ***
A jury convicted the defendant on six counts of armed bank robbery in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2113(a) and (d) and six corresponding counts of brandishing a firearm in connection with a crime of violence in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 924(c). The district court sentenced the defendant to six months in prison on the bank robberies and the mandatory consecutive terms of seven years on the first firearm count and 25 years on each additional firearm count. The defendant’s total sentence is 132 years, 6 months.
The defendant raises four issues on appeal. We reject each.
First, the evidence was easily sufficient to allow a reasonable jury to conclude that the defendant committed each of the offenses. In addition to other evidence, at least one eyewitness identified the defendant as the person who committed each of the first five robberies. And the defendant was arrested in possession of the proceeds of the sixth robbery after a high-speed chase in which the defendant exchanged gunfire with law enforcement officers.
Second, evidence of the chase was not inadmissible under Federal Rule of Evidence 404(b). This is so for at least two reasons. The chase was inextricably intertwined with the robbery, so Rule 404(b) does not apply at all. And the chase was probative of identity, a permissible purpose explicitly recognized by the rule.
Third, binding precedent establishes that armed bank robbery in violation of § 2113(a) and (d) is a crime of violence under § 924(c). See United States v. Watson, 881 F.3d 782, 785 (9th Cir. 2018).
Fourth, binding precedent makes clear that the sentence did not violate the Eighth Amendment. See, e.g., United States v. Hungerford, 465 F.3d 1113, 1118 (9th Cir. 2006) (upholding a 159-year sentence based primarily on § 924(c) ); United States v. Parker, 241 F.3d 1114, 1117-18 (9th Cir. 2001) (upholding a 74-year sentence based primarily on § 924(c) ); United States v. Harris, 154 F.3d 1082, 1084 (9th Cir. 1998) (upholding a 95-year sentence based primarily on § 924(c) ).
AFFIRMED.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: No. 17-10251
Decided: October 24, 2018
Court: United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)