Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Ani GHAZARYAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. EQUIFAX INFORMATION SERVICES, LLC, A Georgia Limited Liability Company, Defendant-Appellee.
MEMORANDUM **
Ani Ghazaryan appeals the district court's order granting summary judgment on her claims against Equifax Information Services, LLC for violations of the Fair Credit Reporting Act (“FCRA”), 15 U.S.C. § 1681i, and the Consumer Credit Reporting Agencies Act, Cal. Civ. Code § 1785.16. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. Reviewing de novo, see Shaw v. Experian Info. Sols., Inc., 891 F.3d 749, 755 (9th Cir. 2018), we affirm.
In conducting a reinvestigation, a consumer credit reporting agency must “review and consider all relevant information” that the consumer submits regarding the disputed information, 15 U.S.C. § 1681i(a)(4); Cal. Civ. Code § 1785.16(b), notify the furnisher within five business days, 15 U.S.C. § 1681i(a)(2)(A); Cal. Civ. Code § 1785.16(a), and “promptly” correct or delete from the consumer's file any inaccurate, incomplete, or unverifiable information, 15 U.S.C. § 1681i(a)(5)(A)(i); Cal. Civ. Code § 1785.16(b).
Viewing the factual record in the light most favorable to Ghazaryan, Equifax's investigation was reasonable as a matter of law. Equifax notified Discover that Ghazaryan disputed being late on her credit card payment and stated that Discover representative Jordan “confirmed ․ that she was never late.” Equifax also passed along the phone number for Jordan that Ghazaryan had provided. Equifax transmitted this information “in the manner established with” Discover, 15 U.S.C. § 1681i(a)(2)(A), using ACDV, the “automated system” envisioned by the FCRA, 15 U.S.C. § 1681i(a)(5)(D).
Equifax had no duty, as Ghazaryan contends, “to resolve the ultimate contradiction between Discover's response to the ACDV versus the confirmation of inaccuracy made by [Jordan].” “[C]redit reporting agencies are not tribunals. They simply collect and report information furnished by others.” Carvalho v. Equifax Info. Servs., LLC, 629 F.3d 876, 891 (9th Cir. 2010). Equifax had determined Discover to be a reliable source, and Ghazaryan gave Equifax no reason to question that determination. Therefore, Equifax was entitled to rely on Discover's confirmation that Ghazaryan had missed a payment notwithstanding that this information ultimately proved to be inaccurate.
AFFIRMED.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: No. 17-55132
Decided: October 18, 2018
Court: United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)