Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Garabed O. MIRZOIAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Michel N. EL-RAHI; Nidal Z. Zayed, Defendants-Appellees.
MEMORANDUM **
Garabed O. Mirzoian appeals pro se from the district court's order dismissing for lack of subject matter jurisdiction Mirzoian's employment action alleging wrongful termination in violation of Title VII, the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”), the Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act (“GINA”), and the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (“ADEA”). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo a dismissal for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Sommatino v. United States, 255 F.3d 704, 708 (9th Cir. 2001). We vacate and remand.
The district court dismissed Mirzoian's action for lack of subject matter jurisdiction because it concluded that Mirzoian failed to exhaust administrative remedies. However, although Mirzoian did not file a discrimination charge with the EEOC until 2015, he filed a discrimination complaint with the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands (“CNMI”) Department of Labor within 18 days of his termination in 2006. See 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-5(e)(1) (a charge must be made with the EEOC within 180 days of the alleged unlawful employment practice or within 300 days if a charge is first made with an authorized state agency); see also Laquaglia v. Rio Hotel & Casino, Inc., 186 F.3d 1172, 1174-1175 (9th Cir. 1999) (explaining that under worksharing agreements between EEOC and some state agencies, when a charge is filed with the state agency before the 300-day filing deadline expires, it is deemed automatically filed with the EEOC on that same day). It is not clear from the district court's order whether the district court considered the effect of Mirzoian's filing of the complaint with the CNMI Department of Labor on the issue of exhaustion of administrative remedies.
We therefore vacate the dismissal order and remand for the district court to consider whether Mirzoian could be deemed to have constructively filed his claims with the EEOC on the day he filed his charge with the CNMI Department of Labor, and therefore exhausted his administrative remedies at that time.
VACATED and REMANDED.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: No. 18-15367
Decided: July 13, 2018
Court: United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)