Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
WESTERN MORTGAGE & REALTY COMPANY, a Washington corporation, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. KEYBANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, a national banking association and KeyCorp Capital, Inc., an Ohio corporation, Defendants-Appellees.
MEMORANDUM **
Western Mortgage & Realty Co. appeals the district court's order granting summary judgment to KeyBank National Association and KeyCorp Capital, Inc. (collectively, “KeyBank”). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.
On May 23, 2007, Western Mortgage entered into a contract for the purchase of certain debts believed to be owned by KeyBank. On August 3, 2010, the parties agreed to amend the purchase price for the contract. Western Mortgage filed this action on April 9, 2013, alleging that KeyBank failed to transfer good title to one of the debts enumerated in the original contract.
The district court correctly ruled that Western Mortgage's breach of contract and breach of warranties claims are barred by Idaho's five year statute of limitations. See Idaho Code § 5-216. The relevant warranties were agreed to in a contract that closed on May 23, 2007, which started the statute of limitations. Western Mortgage did not file its complaint until nearly six years later. The statute of limitations was not restarted when the parties amended the purchase price of the contract because that amendment concerned a discrete matter independent of the warranties. The statute of limitations also was not restarted by Idaho Code § 5-238 because that section is inapplicable to the facts here, where a debtor did not promise to pay a debt. See Mahas v. Kasiska, 47 Idaho 179, 276 P. 315, 317 (1928).
The district court correctly dismissed Western Mortgage's fraud claims. The district court properly concluded that Western Mortgage could have discovered the alleged fraud by reasonable diligence before April 9, 2010. Thus, Western Mortgage's claim is barred by Idaho's three year statute of limitations for fraud. See Idaho Code § 5-218(4). An email sent by KeyBank's Vice President did not constitute fraud because, in context, the email was one of opinion and not of fact. See Nelson v. Hoff, 70 Idaho 354, 218 P.2d 345, 349 (1950).
AFFIRMED.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: No. 15-35821
Decided: September 18, 2017
Court: United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)