Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
JOSEPH PATRICK ROMAN SIMON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. JAMES E. HENNING, Facility Chaplain, individual and official capacity; H. GOMEZ, Facility Commander, individual and official capacity, Defendants-Appellees.
MEMORANDUM*
California pretrial detainee Joseph Patrick Roman Simon appeals pro se from the district court's summary judgment for failure to exhaust administrative remedies in his § 1983 action relating to his alleged denial of kosher meals and Passover observance. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo. Williams v. Paramo, 775 F.3d 1182, 1191 (9th Cir. 2015). We vacate and remand.
The district court dismissed Simon's action for failure to exhaust, finding that Simon failed to provide evidence that he was unaware of West Valley Detention Center's grievance procedures in 2012 and 2013. However, Simon provided evidence that the resources available to him during this period failed to explain that he was required to file a second appeal with the facility manager, and that Simon was not otherwise made aware of a second level of appeal. This evidence was sufficient to raise a genuine issue of material fact as to whether administrative remedies were effectively unavailable to Simon. See Ross v. Blake, 136 S. Ct. 1850, 1859 (2016) (“[W]hen a remedy is ․ essentially ‘unknowable’ – so that no ordinary prisoner can make sense of what it demands – then it is also unavailable.”). Accordingly, we vacate and remand for further proceedings.
Simon's motion informing the court of retaliatory conduct of jail officials, filed on February 19, 2016, is denied.
VACATED and REMANDED.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: No. 15-56789
Decided: February 27, 2017
Court: United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)