Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
RAVALLI COUNTY REPUBLICAN CENTRAL COMMITTEE; GALLATIN COUNTY REPUBLICAN CENTRAL COMMITTEE; SANDERS COUNTY REPUBLICAN CENTRAL COMMITTEE; DAWSON COUNTY REPUBLICAN CENTRAL COMMITTEE; STILLWATER COUNTY REPUBLICAN CENTRAL COMMITTEE; RICHLAND COUNTY REPUBLICAN CENTRAL COMMITTEE; CARBON COUNTY REPUBLICAN CENTRAL COMMITTEE; FLATHEAD COUNTY REPUBLICAN CENTRAL COMMITTEE; MADISON COUNTY REPUBLICAN CENTRAL COMMITTEE; BIG HORN COUNTY REPUBLICAN CENTRAL COMMITTEE; MONTANA REPUBLICAN PARTY, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. LINDA McCULLOCH, in her official capacity as Montana's Secretary of State; REGINA PLETTENBERG, in her official capacity as the Election Administrator of Ravalli County; CHARLOTTE MILLS, n her official capacity as the Election Administrator of Gallatin County; BOBBI CHRISTENSEN, in her official capacity as the Election Administrator of Sanders County; SHIRLEY KREIMAN, in her official capacity as the Election Administrator of Dawson County; PAULINE MISHLER, in her capacity as the Election Administrator of Stillwater County; STEPHANIE VERHASSELT, in her official capacity as the Election Administrator for Richland County; JUDY CHRISTENSEN, in her official capacity as the Election Administrator for Carbon County; PAULA ROBINSON, in her official capacity as the Election Administrator for Flathead County; PEGGY STEMLER, in her official capacity as the Election Administrator for Madison county; KIMBERLY YARLOTT, in her official capacity as the Election Administrator for Big Horn County, Defendants-Appellees.
ORDER
This is an appeal from the denial of a preliminary injunction. Plaintiffs' motion sought the preliminary injunction to prohibit certain action by State officials with respect to the then-approaching June 2016 primary election. Because we cannot grant effective relief with respect to an election that has already taken place, this action is moot. See Vegas Diamond Props. LLC v. FDIC, 669 F.3d 933, 936, (9th Cir. 2012) (“This action is moot becuase the activities sought to be enjoined have already occurred and can no longer be prevented.”).
Moreover, County Committee Plaintiffs-Appellants have voluntarily dismissed the underlying action with prejudice. The office of a preliminary injunction is, of course, to grant necessary injunctive relief pendente lite and its term of office expires once the litigation comes to an end. Here, the dismissal of the underlying action has obviated any need to consider preliminary injunctive relief. To the extent that appellants seek to raise other or broader issues, they have now noticed another pending appeal from the order dismissing the action, in No. 16-35375, where, presumably, such questions can be litigated.
Appeal DISMISSED. No costs.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: No. 15-35967
Decided: July 22, 2016
Court: United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)