Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Lonnie D. SNELLING Plaintiff - Appellant v. CITY OF ST. LOUIS, MISSOURI, a municipality; Stephen Perry, Officer, DSN #0594, in their official capacity; Christina Powderly, Officer, DSN #0594, in theri official capacity Defendants - Appellees Chris Myess, Officer, DSN #?, in their official capacity Defendant Martin Walls, DSN #?, in their official capacity Defendant - Appellee Willie Prothro, DSN #?, Necessary Party - in their official capacity; Jane Doe Prothro, Officer, DSN #?, Necessary Party, in their official capacity Defendants John Does, Officer, DSN #?, in their official capacity; Jane Does, Officer, DSN #?, in their official capacity; Russell Alowel, Building Inspectors, in their official capacity; Adebanjo Popoolas, Building Inspectors, in their official capacity; Stephen Perry, in his individual capacity; Christina Powderly, in her individual capacity; Willie C. Hemphill, Jr., Individually and Owner, also known as Apostle Wrecking & Excacating, also known as Apostle Demolition & Excavating Defendants - Appellees Ellsworth Douglas Ware, III, Agent and Individually; Jason Sengheiser, Judge, Necessary Party, in his Official Capacity Defendants Land Reutilization Authority, (LRA) a Municipal Corporation in its Proprietary Capacity; Willie C. Hemphill, Jr., Individually and Owner, doing business as Cheyenne Contracting; John Doe Independent Contractors, if any; Leon Reitz, Individually and Jointly; Daniel Chamblian, DSN # unknown; Sean Lipina, DSN #6897; Chris Myers, DSN #11332; David E. Love; Betty L. Williams, also known as Betty Johnson, also known as Betty L. Love; Teresa B. Morrow; Park Place Preservation LP Defendants - Appellees
[Unpublished]
Lonnie Snelling appeals after the district court 1 dismissed his action raising numerous federal and state-law claims stemming from interactions he had with defendants regarding his property in St. Louis, Missouri, and denied his postjudgment motion under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 59(e). We review de novo the district court's dismissal of Snelling's 42 U.S.C. § 1983 claims and one of his state-law claims. See Newcombe v. United States, 933 F.3d 915, 917 (8th Cir. 2019); Levy v. Ohl, 477 F.3d 988, 991 (8th Cir. 2007). We review for an abuse of discretion the district court's decision not to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over Snelling's state-law claims as well as its denial of Snelling's Rule 59(e) motion. See Thompson v. Kanabec Cnty., 958 F.3d 698, 708 (8th Cir. 2020); Rinchuso v. Brookshire Grocery Co., 944 F.3d 725, 730 (8th Cir. 2019). Finding no error or abuse of discretion, we affirm for the reasons stated in the district court's thorough opinions. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
FOOTNOTES
1. The Honorable Rodney W. Sippel, Chief Judge, United States District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri.
PER CURIAM.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: No. 20-1033
Decided: September 23, 2020
Court: United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)