Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. Jerome NASH, Defendant - Appellant.
[Unpublished]
Jerome Nash appeals after he pleaded guilty to unlawfully possessing a firearm as a felon. The district court 1 sentenced him under the Armed Career Criminal Act (ACCA), 18 U.S.C. § 924(e), to 180 months in prison. His counsel has moved to withdraw, and has filed a brief under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), challenging the determination that Nash’s prior second-degree robbery convictions qualified as ACCA predicate offenses.
After careful de novo review, we conclude that the district court did not err in concluding that Nash’s prior Missouri second-degree robbery convictions qualified as ACCA predicate offenses. This court previously has determined that a conviction under Missouri’s second-degree robbery statute categorically qualifies as an ACCA predicate offense. See United States v. Swopes, 886 F.3d 668, 671 (8th Cir. 2018) (en banc), cert. denied, ––– U.S. ––––, 139 S. Ct. 1258, 203 L.Ed.2d 281 (2019); see also United States v. Scott, 627 F.3d 702, 704 (8th Cir. 2010).
Having independently reviewed the record under Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), we find no nonfrivolous issues for appeal outside the scope of the appeal waiver. Accordingly, we grant counsel’s motion to withdraw, and affirm the judgment of the district court.
FOOTNOTES
1. The Honorable Ronnie L. White, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Missouri.
PER CURIAM.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: No. 19-2944
Decided: May 08, 2020
Court: United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)