Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
UNITED STATES of America Plaintiff - Appellee v. Jose Luis CHAVARIN ZAVALA Defendant - Appellant
[Unpublished]
Jose Zavala pleaded guilty to the distribution of methamphetamine, 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1). As part of his plea agreement, he waived his right to appeal unless the district court 1 imposed greater than a ten-year sentence, the statutory minimum for his offense. See id. § 841(b)(1)(A). It did not do so. Nevertheless, in an Anders brief, Zavala’s counsel raises the substantive reasonableness of the sentence as a potential issue on appeal and asks us to give Zavala another shot at qualifying for the so-called safety valve that would make him eligible for a shorter sentence. See 18 U.S.C. § 3553(f) (allowing a drug-conspiracy defendant to receive a sentence below the statutory minimum if, among other things, the sentencing court finds that he “truthfully provided to the Government all information and evidence” concerning the conspiracy); see also Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Counsel also seeks permission to withdraw.
We review the validity and applicability of an appeal waiver de novo. See United States v. Scott, 627 F.3d 702, 704 (8th Cir. 2010). Upon careful review, we conclude that the appeal waiver is enforceable and that it is applicable to the issues raised on appeal. See United States v. Andis, 333 F.3d 886, 889–92 (8th Cir. 2003) (en banc) (explaining that an appeal waiver will be enforced if the appeal falls within the scope of the waiver, the defendant knowingly and voluntarily entered into the plea agreement and the waiver, and enforcing the waiver would not result in a miscarriage of justice). We have also independently reviewed the record under Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), and conclude that there are no non-frivolous issues for appeal falling outside the scope of the appeal waiver. Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal and grant counsel permission to withdraw.
FOOTNOTES
1. The Honorable Ann D. Montgomery, United States District Judge for the District of Minnesota.
PER CURIAM.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: No. 18-3072
Decided: May 22, 2019
Court: United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)