Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
UNITED STATES of America Plaintiff-Appellee v. Jose CORIO-RAYMUNDO, also known as Jose Raymundo-Corio Defendant-Appellant
[Unpublished]
Following a jury trial, Jose Corio-Raymundo was found guilty of knowingly using a forged identification document as evidence of authorized employment, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1546(a), and of misusing for tax purposes a social security number not assigned to him, in violation of 42 U.S.C. § 408(a)(7)(B). The district court 1 sentenced Corio-Raymundo to six months in prison and three years of supervised release, and he appeals, challenging the sufficiency of the evidence supporting the jury verdict and the reasonableness of the sentence.
The evidence at trial established, in part, that Corio-Raymundo acknowledged his work ineligibility during an encounter with an Immigration and Customs Enforcement employee earlier in the year before he provided an employer with a Form I-9 and a Form W-4 bearing his name and a social security account number assigned to another person, as well as a fraudulent version of a social security card with Corio-Raymundo’s name and that same social security account number. Viewed in a light most favorable to the verdict, this evidence was sufficient to prove the elements of the offenses beyond a reasonable doubt. See United States v. Machorro-Xochicale, 840 F.3d 545, 548 (8th Cir. 2016) (setting forth standard of review and elements of offenses), cert. denied, ––– U.S. ––––, 137 S.Ct. 1214, 197 L.Ed.2d 255 (2017). We also reject Corio-Raymundo’s challenge to the reasonableness of his six-month prison sentence because we conclude that the district court, after considering the 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) sentencing factors, did not abuse it’s discretion. See United States v. Callaway, 762 F.3d 754, 760-61 (8th Cir. 2014) (presuming reasonableness of within-Guidelines sentence).
The judgment is affirmed.
FOOTNOTES
1. The Honorable Linda R. Reade, United States District Judge for the Northern District of Iowa.
PER CURIAM.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: No. 18-2805
Decided: April 22, 2019
Court: United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)