Skip to main content

BELL III v. UNITED STATES (2019)

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

Ellis Lee BELL, III, Petitioner-Appellee, v. UNITED STATES of America, Respondent-Appellant.

United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Ellis Lee Bell, III, Defendant-Appellee.

Nos. 17-6416/6417

Decided: July 24, 2019

BEFORE: McKEAGUE, KETHLEDGE, and MURPHY, Circuit Judges. Isaiah S. Gant, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Molly Rose Green, Michael C. Holley, Federal Public Defender's Office, Nashville, TN, for Petitioner-Appellee Cecil Woods VanDevender, Ahmed Azzaam Safeeullah, Office of the U.S. Attorney, Nashville, TN, for Respondent-Appellant

OPINION

Ellis Bell, III, was charged in federal court with unlawful possession of a firearm by a convicted felon, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g). Bell ultimately pled guilty to the charge. The Presentence Investigation Report (PSR) found that Bell had four prior convictions, three for aggravated burglary and one for burglary. Based on this, Bell qualified for an enhancement under the Armed Career Criminal Act (ACCA), which mandates a 15-year minimum sentence if a defendant has three prior convictions which constitute “violent felon[ies].” 18 U.S.C. § 924(e)(1). Bell did not object to the PSR. The district court accepted Bell's plea agreement and imposed a sentence of 180 months.

In 2016, Bell filed a motion to vacate, set aside, or correct his sentence in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 2255. In light of our decision in United States v. Stitt, 860 F.3d 854 (6th Cir. 2017) (en banc), the district court granted Bell's habeas petition and re-sentenced Bell. In 2018, the Supreme Court reversed our holding in Stitt. United States v. Stitt, ––– U.S. ––––, 139 S. Ct. 399, 406-07, 202 L.Ed.2d 364 (2018). The government requests that we remand to the district court to reinstate Bell's original sentence.

This appeal raises the same issues as those we considered in Brumbach v. United States, 929 F.3d 791 (6th Cir. 2019). And we find that Brumbach controls our decision here. Id. at *3.

Accordingly, we reverse the district court's grant of habeas relief, vacate the amended criminal judgment, and remand with instructions to reinstate the original sentence.

McKEAGUE, Circuit Judge.

Was this helpful?

Thank you. Your response has been sent.

Welcome to FindLaw's Cases & Codes

A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.

Go to Learn About the Law
BELL III v. UNITED STATES (2019)

Docket No: Nos. 17-6416/6417

Decided: July 24, 2019

Court: United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

Get a profile on the #1 online legal directory

Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.

Sign up

Learn About the Law

Get help with your legal needs

FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.

Learn more about the law
Copied to clipboard