Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Juan Pedro GARZA, Jr., also known as El Comanche, Defendant-Appellant
Juan Pedro Garza, Jr., federal prisoner # 43408-177, pleaded guilty in 2011 to unlawful possession of a machine gun, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(o), and possession with intent to distribute 50 grams or more of methamphetamine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1) and (b)(1)(A)(viii). The district court sentenced Garza in 2012 to 120 months of imprisonment on the firearm charge and 235 months of imprisonment on the drug charge to run concurrently. In 2016, the district court reduced Garza's term of imprisonment on the drug charge to 188 months pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2).
Now Garza appeals the denial of his motion to reduce his sentence under the First Step Act. He argues that the district court abused its discretion in denying his motion under the First Step Act's provision broadening the existing safety valve because he does not have more than four criminal history points.
The district court did not exercise its discretion in denying Garza's motion but denied it on the basis that he was ineligible based on the terms of the statute because he was convicted before the effective date of the provision in question; thus, we review de novo. See United States v. Jackson, 945 F.3d 315, 319 (5th Cir. 2019), cert. denied, No. 19-8036, ––– U.S. ––––, ––– S. Ct. ––––, 206 L.Ed.2d 839 (U.S. Apr. 20, 2020).
The First Step Act amended the safety-valve provision of 18 U.S.C. § 3553(f), which permits courts to disregard statutory mandatory minimum sentences under certain circumstances. See § 402, 132 Stat. 5194, 5221. However, the amendments “apply only to a conviction entered on or after the date of enactment of this Act.” § 402(b). The First Step Act became law on December 21, 2018. See United States v. Hegwood, 934 F.3d 414, 416 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, ––– U.S. ––––, 140 S. Ct. 285, 205 L.Ed.2d 195 (2019). Thus, the safety-valve provision of the First Step Act in § 402 does not apply to Garza. See United States v. Cantu Hernandez, 787 F. App'x 849 (5th Cir. 2019). The district court did not err.
AFFIRMED.
FOOTNOTES
PER CURIAM:* FN* Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: No. 19-11296
Decided: June 29, 2020
Court: United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)