Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Corinthia LEE, Plaintiff - Appellant v. DOLGENCORP, L.L.C., STORE # 4119, Defendant - Appellee
Corinthia Lee slipped and fell while shopping at her local Dollar General Store. She sued Dolgencorp, L.L.C., and both sides filed motions for summary judgment on liability. The district court granted Dolgencorp’s motion and entered judgment that Lee take nothing from Dolgencorp. Lee timely appealed.1 We AFFIRM.
Under the relevant statute for premises liability, Louisiana Revised Statute Annotated § 9:2800.6(B)(2), a business either must have created or had constructive notice of the hazardous condition 2 prior to the accident in order to be liable for injuries to a customer. “The claimant must make a positive showing of the existence of the condition prior to the fall. A defendant merchant does not have to make a positive showing of the absence of the existence of the condition prior to the fall.” Babin v. Winn-Dixie La., Inc., 764 So. 2d 37, 40 (La. 2000) (quoting White v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 699 So. 2d 1081, 1084 (La. 1997) (internal quotation marks omitted)). The district court concluded that Lee offered no evidence to support a finding as to how long the hazardous condition had existed before Lee fell. We agree.
AFFIRMED.
FOOTNOTES
1. The district court had diversity jurisdiction over this case, and we have jurisdiction over the appeal under 28 U.S.C. § 1291.
2. At varying times, Lee identified the hazardous condition as a flag, water, or water and the flag. The distinctions among these potential hazards, however, do not affect the outcome of this appeal.
PER CURIAM:* FN* Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: No. 19-30366
Decided: November 13, 2019
Court: United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)