GRANT v. CITY OF ROANOKE VIRGINIA (2020)

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Mark T. GRANT, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. The CITY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA, Defendant - Appellee.

No. 19-1999

Decided: June 29, 2020

Before MOTZ and KEENAN, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit Judge.

Mark T. Grant, Appellant Pro Se. David L. Collins, OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY FOR THE CITY OF ROANOKE, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellee.

Mark T. Grant appeals the district court's orders denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2018) complaint.^* We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Grant v. City of Roanoke, No. 7:16-cv-00007-MFU (W.D. Va. July 18, 2017; Nov. 7, 2017; and Mar. 19, 2019). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

FOOTNOTES

FOOTNOTE. The district court determined that Grant was entitled to reopening of his time to file an appeal under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(6). The City does not challenge this finding on appeal. Accordingly, we deny the City's motion to dismiss the appeal as untimely.

PER CURIAM:

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Welcome to FindLaw's Cases & Codes

A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.

Go to Learn About the Law