GRANT v. CITY OF ROANOKE VIRGINIA (2020)

Mark T. Grant appeals the district court's orders denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2018) complaint.^* We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Grant v. City of Roanoke, No. 7:16-cv-00007-MFU (W.D. Va. July 18, 2017; Nov. 7, 2017; and Mar. 19, 2019). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

FOOTNOTES

FOOTNOTE.   The district court determined that Grant was entitled to reopening of his time to file an appeal under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(6). The City does not challenge this finding on appeal. Accordingly, we deny the City's motion to dismiss the appeal as untimely.

PER CURIAM:

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.