STEIN v. CHARLOTTE MECKLENBURG HOSPITAL AUTHORITY 11 (2020)
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Carol Andrea STEIN, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. CHARLOTTE-MECKLENBURG HOSPITAL AUTHORITY; Charlotte-Mecklenburg Police Department; Charlotte Housing Authority; Federal Bureau of Investigation; Michael Tarwater; Eugene A. Woods; Frank Moon; Kerr Putney; Rodney Monroe; Darrel Stephens; George Connor; Jesse Dozier; Dexter Moseley; Fulton Meacham; Robert Mueller; James Comey; Nathan Gray; Lila Wigan; Does, 1-11, Defendants - Appellees.
Decided: April 16, 2020
Before WILKINSON, QUATTLEBAUM, and RUSHING, Circuit Judges.
Carol Andrea Stein, Appellant Pro Se. Gwendolyn Williams Lewis, LINCOLN DERR PLLC, Charlotte, North Carolina; Theodore Curtis Edwards, II, Dylan Benjamin Hix, BANKS LAW FIRM, PA, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, for Appellees.
Carol Andrea Stein appeals the district court's order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on Stein's 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2018) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Stein v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Hosp. Auth., No. 3:18-cv-00564-RJC-DSC, 2019 WL 4744228 (W.D.N.C. Sept. 27, 2019). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Was this helpful?
Response sent, thank you
Welcome to FindLaw's Cases & Codes
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.