Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
George GRAVES, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. WESTFORD HEALTH SERVICE; Yonas Sisay, MD, Defendants - Appellees.
George Graves, a Maryland prisoner, seeks to appeal the district court's order granting summary judgment in favor of Defendants on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2018) complaint. The district court entered the order on July 17, 2019. Graves filed his notice of appeal, at the latest, on January 6, 2020. See Houston v. Lack, 487 U.S. 266, 276, 108 S.Ct. 2379, 101 L.Ed.2d 245 (1988) (establishing prison mailbox rule). Graves’ notice of appeal is clearly untimely. See Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1)(A). Graves, however, claimed that he never received a copy of the district court's order, and there is some evidence in the record supporting this assertion.
Pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(6), the district court may reopen the time to file an appeal for a 14-day period if: (1) the movant did not receive proper notice of the entry of the judgment within 21 days after entry; (2) the motion to reopen the appeal period is filed within 180 days after the order is entered or within 14 days after the movant receives proper notice of the entry, whichever is earlier; and (3) no party would be prejudiced. Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(6); see Fed. R. Civ. P. 77(d). Because Graves claimed that he never received a copy of the court's order, and he filed the notice of appeal within 180 days after entry of the order, we construe the notice of appeal as a motion to reopen the appeal period under Rule 4(a)(6). We remand to the district court to determine whether the appeal period should be reopened.* The record, as supplemented, will be returned to this court for further consideration.
REMANDED
FOOTNOTES
FOOTNOTE. If the district court determines that Graves has not received a copy of the order, it should mail him a copy promptly.
PER CURIAM:
Remanded by unpublished per curiam opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: No. 20-6076
Decided: March 17, 2020
Court: United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)