Skip to main content
Find a Lawyer

BRYANT v. SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION (2020)

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Anthony G. BRYANT, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION; South Carolina Department of Commerce; Secretary of Trade of South Carolina; South Carolina Department of Education, Defendants-Appellees.

Anthony G. Bryant, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. City of Charleston Police Department; Charleston County Sheriff's Office; Charleston County Consolidated Schools; City of North Charleston Police; Town of Mount Pleasant Police; South Carolina Law Enforcement Division, Defendants-Appellees.

Anthony G. Bryant, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. City of Charleston Police Department; Charleston County Sheriff's Office; City of North Charleston Police Department; Charleston County Consolidated Schools; City of North Charleston Police; Town of Mount Pleasant Police; South Carolina Law Enforcement Division, Defendants-Appellees.

Anthony G. Bryant, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. South Carolina Public Service Commission; Attorney General of South Carolina; South Carolina Public Safety; South Carolina Real Estate Commission; South Carolina Department of Revenue; South Carolina Department of Corrections, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 19-1983, No. 19-1984, No. 19-1985, No. 19-1986

Decided: January 27, 2020

Before WYNN, DIAZ, and RICHARDSON, Circuit Judges.

Anthony G. Bryant, Appellant Pro Se.

Anthony G. Bryant seeks to appeal the district court's order orders requiring him to pay the full filing fees for these four civil actions. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2018), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2018); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-46, 69 S.Ct. 1221, 93 L.Ed. 1528 (1949). The orders that Bryant seeks to appeal are neither final orders nor appealable interlocutory or collateral orders. Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss these appeals for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

PER CURIAM:

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Was this helpful?

Welcome to FindLaw's Cases & Codes

A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.

Go to Learn About the Law

BRYANT v. SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION (2020)

Docket No: No. 19-1983, No. 19-1984, No. 19-1985, No. 19-1986

Decided: January 27, 2020

Court: United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Need to find an attorney?

Search our directory by legal issue

Enter information in one or both fields (Required)

    More Options

    For Legal Professionals

    Get a profile on the #1 online legal directory

    Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.

    Sign up

    Learn About the Law

    Get help with your legal needs

    FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.

    Go to Learn About the Law

    Need to find an attorney?

    Search our directory by legal issue

    Enter information in one or both fields (Required)

      More Options
      Copied to clipboard