Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Reinaldo OLAVARRIA, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. Roy COOPER, Governor; Barbara Gibson, Director of North Carolina Human Resources; Mark Martin, Chief Justice; Charlton A. Allen, Chair of the North Carolina Industrial Commission; Zachary Padget; Rana Badwin, in her Official Capacity; Alexander Walton, in his Official Capacity; Erika Frazier, in her Official Capacity; Mandy Cohen, NCDHHS Secretary, Defendants - Appellees, State of North Carolina, Defendant.
Reinaldo Olavarria appeals the district court's order granting Defendants’ motions to dismiss his federal complaint raising several constitutional and civil rights claims, including a discrimination claim brought pursuant to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C.A. §§ 2000e to 2000e-17 (West 2012 & Supp. 2018) (Title VII). The district court dismissed Olavarria's Title VII claim because Olavarria failed to plead that he adminstratively exhausted the claim. Soon after the district court granted Defendants’ motions, however, the Supreme Court issued its opinion in Fort Bend Cty., Tx. v. Davis, ––– U.S. ––––, 139 S. Ct. 1843, 1850, 204 L.Ed.2d 116 (2019), in which the Court held that Title VII's charge-filing requirement is not jurisdictional. We thus vacate the district court's order and remand for further consideration in light of Davis. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
VACATED AND REMANDED
PER CURIAM:
Vacated and remanded by unpublished per curiam opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: No. 19-1536
Decided: August 26, 2019
Court: United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)