Skip to main content
Find a Lawyer

DICKSON v. PRICE DDS FBI FBI (2019)

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

John M. DICKSON, Jr., Plaintiff - Appellant, v. Mayor McKinley L. PRICE, DDS, In his individual capacity, as a person acting under Color of State Law; City of Newport News, Virginia, In its individual capacity as a person, acting under Color of State Law; Former Chief of Police of the City of Newport News, Virginia, Richard W. Myers, In his individual capacity as a person, acting under Color of State Law; City of Newport News Virginia Police Officers John/Jane Doe, In their individual capacities as persons, acting under Color of State Law; City of Hampton, Virginia, In its individual capacity as a person, acting under Color of State Law; Chief of Police Mr. Terry Sult for the City of Hampton, Virginia, In his individual capacity, as a person acting under Color of State Law; City of Hampton Virginia Police Technical Police Officer(s) John/Jane Doe(s), In their individual capacities, as persons acting under Color of State Law; City of Hampton Virginia Police Officers John/Jane Doe(s), In their individual capacities as persons acting under Color of State Law; FBI Agent Mrs./Ms. Katherine Andrews, Former Special Agent in Charge of the Newport News Field Office, In her individual capacity, as a person acting under Color of federal and State Law; FBI Newport News Field Office, John/Jane Doe(s), Technical and Field Agent(s), In their individual capacities, as persons acting under Color of federal and State Law, Defendants - Appellees.

No. 19-1426

Decided: June 24, 2019

Before NIEMEYER, AGEE, and RICHARDSON, Circuit Judges.

John M. Dickson, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.

John M. Dickson, Jr., appeals the district court's order denying his Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) motion. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Dickson v. Price, No. 4:18-cv-00001-AWA-DEM (E.D. Va. Mar. 19, 2019). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

PER CURIAM:

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Was this helpful?

Welcome to FindLaw's Cases & Codes

A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.

Go to Learn About the Law

DICKSON v. PRICE DDS FBI FBI (2019)

Docket No: No. 19-1426

Decided: June 24, 2019

Court: United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Need to find an attorney?

Search our directory by legal issue

Enter information in one or both fields (Required)

    More Options

    For Legal Professionals

    Get a profile on the #1 online legal directory

    Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.

    Sign up

    Learn About the Law

    Get help with your legal needs

    FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.

    Go to Learn About the Law

    Need to find an attorney?

    Search our directory by legal issue

    Enter information in one or both fields (Required)

      More Options
      Copied to clipboard