Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Olandio Ray WORKMAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Scotty BODIFORD, Jail Administrator individual capacity official capacity; Major Stowers, individual capacity official capacity; Jimmy Thompson, Mail Room Supervisor individual capacity official capacity; Sergeant Bowman, individual capacity official capacity; Officer Jennings, individual capacity official capacity; Officer Shoklly, individual capacity official capacity; Officer Collier, individual capacity official capacity, Defendants-Appellees, Joseph Kernell, Greenville County Administrator individual capacity official capacity; John Vandermosten, Interim Assistance County Administrator individual capacity official capacity; Ennis Fant, individual capacity official capacity; Willis Meadows, individual capacity official capacity; Lynn Ballard, individual capacity official capacity; Joe Dill, individual capacity official capacity; Butch Kirveny, individual capacity official capacity; Sid Cates, individual capacity official capacity; Rick Robert, individual capacity official capacity; Fred Payne, individual capacity official capacity; Xanthene Norris, individual capacity official capacity; Liz Seman, individual capacity official capacity; Bob Taylor, individual capacity official capacity; Greenville County Council, Defendants.
Olandio Ray Workman appeals the district court's orders accepting the recommendations of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Workman v. Bodiford, No. 6:18-cv-00355-RBH, 2018 WL 6829015 (D.S.C. Oct. 2, 2018 & Dec. 28, 2018). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
PER CURIAM:
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Response sent, thank you
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: No. 19-6083
Decided: May 29, 2019
Court: United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
FindLaw for Legal Professionals
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)