Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
William Lee GRANT, II, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE, Defendant-Appellee.
William Lee Grant, II, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. U.S. Department of Defense, Defendant-Appellee.
William Lee Grant, II, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. U.S. Department of Defense, Defendant-Appellee.
William Lee Grant, II, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. United States Department of Defense, Defendant-Appellee.
William Lee Grant, II, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. United States Department of Defense, Defendant-Appellee.
William Lee Grant, II, appeals the district court's orders dismissing his complaints as frivolous under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2012) and denying his motions to amend his complaints. We have reviewed the records and find that these appeals are frivolous. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeals for the reasons stated by the district court. Grant v. U.S. Dep't of Defense, No. 1:18-cv-00939-LO-TCB (E.D. Va. Aug. 20, 2018, Oct. 24, 2018, & Nov. 15, 2018); Grant v. U.S. Dep't of Defense, No. 1:18-cv-01149-LMB-IDD (E.D. Va. Sept. 12, 2018 & Oct. 24, 2018). We grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis in Appeal Nos. 18-2031, 18-2339, and 18-2428.*
In addition, we ordered Grant to show cause as to why he should not be sanctioned for filing frivolous appeals and enjoined from filing any further actions in this court unless he pays the sanctions and a district court finds that the action is not frivolous. We find Grant's response fails to show cause why sanctions and an injunction should not be imposed. Therefore, Grant is sanctioned $ 500 for filing frivolous appeals and enjoined from filing any further actions in this court unless he pays the sanctions and a district court finds that the action is not frivolous. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
FOOTNOTES
FOOTNOTE. Leave to proceed in forma pauperis has previously been granted in Nos. 18-2122 and 18-2331.
PER CURIAM:
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: No. 18-2031, No. 18-2122, No. 18-2331, No. 18-2339, No. 18-2428
Decided: May 17, 2019
Court: United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)