Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
David SIDER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Nana WILSON, a/k/a Charles, in his individual capacity and official capacity as code enforcement inspector; Gary Greene, in his individual capacity and official capacity as code enforcement section chief; Dana Wilson, in his individual capacity and official capacity as code enforcement supervisor; Shahriar Amiri, in his individual capacity and official capacity as chief building official; Tim McDonnell, in his individual capacity and official capacity as owner of McDonnell Landscape, Inc.; George Lopeze, in his individual capacity and official capacity as supervisor of McDonnell Landscape, Inc.; John Doe No. 1, in his individual capacity and official capacity McDonnell Landscape; John Doe No. 2, in his individual capacity and official capacity McDonnell Landscape; John Doe No. 3, in his individual capacity and official capacity McDonnell Landscape; John Doe No. 4, in his individual capacity and official capacity McDonnell Landscape; John Doe No. 5, in his individual capacity and official capacity McDonnell Landscape; John Doe No. 6, in his individual capacity and official capacity McDonell Landscape; Jane Doe No. 1, in her individual capacity and official capacity McDonnell Landscape, Defendants-Appellees.
David Sider appeals the district court's order denying relief on his complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Sider v. Wilson, No. 1:18-cv-00212-LMB-TCB (E.D. Va. June 8, 2018). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
PER CURIAM:
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: No. 18-1776
Decided: April 11, 2019
Court: United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)