Skip to main content
Find a Lawyer

MCCLAIN v. HCA ADA HCA HCA HCA HCA HCA HCA (2019)

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Daniel R. MCCLAIN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Lefford FATE, et alia, Defendant-Appellee, Samuel Soltis, Assc Dir; John B. Tomarchio, Med Dir; Thomas Moore, Med Dir; John A. Davis, Med Dir; Anna Moak, Healthcare Authority (HCA); Janice Phillips, Admin Coord; Angela Hardin, ADA Coord; Warden Ralph Cothran; Warden Nolan; Warden Robe Rts; Assoc. Warden K. Sharp; Assc. Warden Bradshaw; Assc. Warden Dean; Dr. Way; Dr Sharp; Dr Bennett; Dr McRee; Dr Hughes; Dr Hedgepath; Dr Paul Drago; Dr Steen; Dr Bein or; Dr Kay; Dr McCray; Sally Blake, Nurse Practitioner; Salley, Nurse Practitioner; Olsen, Nurse Practitioner; Allen, Nurse Practitioner; Block, Nurse Practitioner; HCA Blackwell; HCA Huggins; HCA Pace; Warden Thomas; Dr Babbs; Warden Colie Rushton; Warden Leroy Cartledge; Assc Warden Kendell; Assc Warden Lewis; Warden Padula; Dr Pate; Dr Kirby; Dr Neville; Dr McFadden; Dr Blackwell; Dr Black; HCA Hodge; Dr Page; Dr Ellison; Dr Quesik; Warden White; Dr Valpey; Dr El Shamil; Dr Michael Kirby; Dr Herbot; Dr Alewine; Greco, Nurse Practitioner; Dr Langston; Dr Leventis; Barbara McKellar, Nurse Practitioner; HCA Thomas Boswell; Holly R. Pisarik, Director; Adrienne Youmans, Director; Mark Dorman, Assistant Deputy Director; Althea B. Myers, Inv; Dr James W Jarvis; Dr Hanns Brings; Dr Brennan; Dr Lucky; Dr Davis; Catherine Templeton, Director; Gloria Provost, Director; David Tatarsky, General Counsel; HCA Sarver; Dr Woods; Linda Dunlap, Defendants.

No. 18-2318

Decided: April 08, 2019

Before NIEMEYER and HARRIS, Circuit Judges, and SHEDD, Senior Circuit Judge.

Daniel R. McClain, Appellant Pro Se. Andrew Lindemann, LINDEMANN, DAVIS & HUGHES, PA, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Daniel R. McClain appeals the district court's text order denying his post-judgment pro se motion to alter or amend judgment and his “Motion Re-asserted for the S.C. State Legislature, et al., As Defendants; and Motion For Injunction Order Re-asserted.” We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. McClain's motions failed to establish any valid basis for relief from the underlying order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) action. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b). Accordingly, we affirm. We deny McClain's motions for injunctive relief pending appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

PER CURIAM:

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Was this helpful?

Welcome to FindLaw's Cases & Codes

A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.

Go to Learn About the Law

MCCLAIN v. HCA ADA HCA HCA HCA HCA HCA HCA (2019)

Docket No: No. 18-2318

Decided: April 08, 2019

Court: United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Need to find an attorney?

Search our directory by legal issue

Enter information in one or both fields (Required)

    More Options

    For Legal Professionals

    Get a profile on the #1 online legal directory

    Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.

    Sign up

    Learn About the Law

    Get help with your legal needs

    FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.

    Go to Learn About the Law

    Need to find an attorney?

    Search our directory by legal issue

    Enter information in one or both fields (Required)

      More Options
      Copied to clipboard