Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
John C. SCOTCHEL, Jr., Plaintiff - Appellant, v. Jessica H. Donahue RHODES, individually and as attorney for the Office of Disciplinary Counsel who represents the Lawyer Disciplinary Board regarding plaintiff’s law license; Rachael L. Fletcher Cipoletti, individually and as Chief Lawyer Disciplinary Counsel and Supervisor of defendant Jessica Donahue Rhodes regarding plaintiff’s law license; Robin Jean Davis, individually, and as Administrator of plaintiff’s law license; Brent D. Benjamin, individually, and as Administrator of plaintiff’s law license; Menis E. Ketchum, individually, and as Administrator of plaintiff’s law license; Margaret L. Workman, individually, and as Administrator of plaintiff’s law license; Allen Hayes Loughry, II, individually, and as Administrator of plaintiff’s law license; The West Virginia State Bar, an authorized agency of the West Virginia Supreme Court, and its duly authorized Executive Officer; Anita Casey; The Lawyer Disciplinary Board, an authorized agency of the West Virginia Supreme Court and its duly authorized Executive Chairperson; Steven K. Nord, Defendants - Appellees, Allan N. Karlin, a/k/a Allan N. Karlin and Associates, individually; Deborah Lynn Robinson, individually; Jeanne R. Russell, individually, Defendants.
John Charles Scotchel, Jr., appeals the district court's orders denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint, denying his motion to alter or amend the judgment, and imposing sanctions pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 11. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Schotchel v. Rhodes, No. 2:17-cv-03353, 2018 WL 1512378 (S.D.W. Va. Mar. 26, 2018). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
PER CURIAM:
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: No. 18-2352
Decided: April 08, 2019
Court: United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)