Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Bobby KNIGHT, a/k/a Bobby Knight, III, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CHENEGA SECURITY, INC.; John Thorpe, Chenga Security, Defendants-Appellees, Robert J. Papp, Jr., United States Coast Guard Admiral; Atlantic Electric, LLC; Legrande Richardson; Michael Richardson, individually; Legrande Richardson, Jr., South Carolina State Department of Labor Licensing & Regulation, as Contractor’s Licensing Board; Lewis M. Caswell, South Carolina State Department of Labor Licensing & Regulation, as Contractor’s Licensing Board; James Edward Lady, South Carolina State Department of Labor Licensing & Regulation, as Contractor’s Licensing Board; Daniel B. Lehman, South Carolina State Department of Labor Licensing & Regulation, as Contractor’s Licensing Board; Kimberly L. Lineberger, South Carolina State Department of Labor Licensing & Regulation, as Contractor’s Licensing Board; Bill Neely, South Carolina State Department of Labor Licensing & Regulation, as Contractor’s Licensing Board; Jamie C. Patterson, South Carolina State Department of Labor Licensing & Regulation, as Contractor’s Licensing Board; W. Franklin Walker, South Carolina State Department of Labor Licensing & Regulation, as Contractor’s Licensing Board; Nikki R. Haley, Governor; George Skip Aldrich, Individual, DHS-USCG CHAS; John Thorpe, Chenega Security; Michael Glazier, Individual, DHS-FLETC CHAS, Defendants.
Bobby Knight appeals from the district court’s amended judgment dismissing Knight’s civil claims against several Defendants. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s amended judgment. See Knight v. Chenega Sec., Inc., No. 2:15-cv-03199-DCN, 2018 WL 3611454 (D.S.C. July 27, 2018). We grant Knight’s motion to supplement the record. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
PER CURIAM:
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: No. 18-1820
Decided: March 18, 2019
Court: United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)