UNITED STATES v. HILL (2019)

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Larry D. HILL, Jr., Defendant-Appellant.

No. 18-7474

Decided: February 26, 2019

Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and AGEE and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

Larry D. Hill, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.

Larry D. Hill, Jr., appeals the district court's text order denying his motion for reconsideration of the order denying his motion to amend his presentence report. Hill offered nothing in his motion for reconsideration to undermine the district court's conclusion that the proposed amendment does not qualify as a correction of a clerical error under Fed. R. Crim. P. 36. And, contrary to his assertion on appeal, Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(a) has no application in a criminal case. Accordingly, we affirm the district court's judgment. United States v. Hill, No. 4:13-cr-00028-BR-1 (E.D.N.C. Nov. 9, 2018). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

PER CURIAM:

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Welcome to FindLaw's Cases & Codes

A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.

Go To Learn About The Law