UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Larry D. HILL, Jr., Defendant-Appellant.
Decided: February 26, 2019
Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and AGEE and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.
Larry D. Hill, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.
Larry D. Hill, Jr., appeals the district court's text order denying his motion for reconsideration of the order denying his motion to amend his presentence report. Hill offered nothing in his motion for reconsideration to undermine the district court's conclusion that the proposed amendment does not qualify as a correction of a clerical error under Fed. R. Crim. P. 36. And, contrary to his assertion on appeal, Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(a) has no application in a criminal case. Accordingly, we affirm the district court's judgment. United States v. Hill, No. 4:13-cr-00028-BR-1 (E.D.N.C. Nov. 9, 2018). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Was this helpful?
Response sent, thank you
Welcome to FindLaw's Cases & Codes
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.