BROWN v. CAPITAL ONE (2019)

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Ella S. BROWN, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CAPITAL ONE, N.A., Defendant-Appellee.

No. 18-1816

Decided: February 06, 2019

Before WYNN and THACKER, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit Judge.

Cory L. Zajdel, Z LAW, LLC, Timonium, Maryland, for Appellant. Jon S. Hubbard, Richmond, Virginia, S. Mohsin Reza, TROUTMAN SANDERS LLP, Washington, D.C., for Appellee.

Ella S. Brown appeals from the district court's order dismissing her putative class action suit against Capital One, N.A., for alleged violations of Maryland's Credit Grantor's Closed End Credit Provisions, Md. Code Ann., Comm. Law § 12-1018 (West 2013). We have reviewed the record included on appeal, as well as the parties’ briefs, and we find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Capital One's motion to file a surreply brief and we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Brown v. Capital One, N.A., No. 8:17-cv-03076-GJH, 2018 WL 3105768 (D. Md. June 25, 2018). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

PER CURIAM:

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network