Faye Beatrice HAYES, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. Terri GORMAN, Official Capacity Individual Capacity; Sean Adgerson, Individual Capacity Official Capacity; James C. Newton, Sr., Individual Capacity Official Capacity; Bart P. Plano, Individual Capacity Official Capacity; William Rommel, Individual Capacity Official Capacity; Mass Transit Administration, Official Capacity Individual Capacity; State of Maryland, Defendants - Appellees.
Decided: January 22, 2019
Before WILKINSON and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Faye Beatrice Hayes, Appellant Pro Se. Eric Scott Hartwig, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.
Faye Beatrice Hayes appeals the district court's order entering judgment in favor of Defendants on Hayes’ several civil claims against them, including discrimination and retaliation claims brought pursuant to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C.A. §§ 2000e to 2000e-17 (West 2012 & Supp. 2018). Confining our review to the issues raised in Hayes’ informal brief, see 4th Cir. R. 34(b), we have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court's order. See Hayes v. Maryland Transit Administration, No. 1:18-cv-00691-RDB, 2018 WL 5809681 (D. Md. Nov. 6, 2018). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Was this helpful?
Response sent, thank you
Welcome to FindLaw's Cases & Codes
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.