Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
The COALITION FOR EQUITY AND EXCELLENCE IN MARYLAND HIGHER EDUCATION, INC., a/k/a Coalition for Equity and Excellence in Maryland Higher Education; Rashaan Simon, a/k/a Rahsaan Simon; David J. Burton; Muriel Thompson; Anthony Robinson; Dr. Chris Heidelberg; Damein Montgomery; Kelly Thompson; J.S., Plaintiffs–Appellees, Sally C. McMillan; Tina M. Vines; David Butler; Dapo Oladapo; Nicholas Washington; Danielle Williams; Zenia Wilson; Jessica Winslow; Crystal Myers; Jomari Smith; Wayne Beckles, Plaintiffs, v. MARYLAND HIGHER EDUCATION COMMISSION; Anwer Hasan, Chairman of the Maryland Higher Education Commission; Jennie C. Hunter-Cevera, Acting Secretary of Higher Education; State of Maryland, Defendants–Appellants, Robert L. Ehrlich, Jr., Governor; State of Maryland; Calvin W. Burnett, Secretary of Higher Education, Defendants. National Association for Equal Opportunity in Higher Education, Amicus Supporting Appellee.
ORDER
The Court considered the arguments of the parties on December 11, 2018, along with the briefs and other items of record, and notes the points and positions raised by all counsel. Upon mature consideration of all these matters, it appears to the Court that both parties have well-presented arguments, but that neither party has a realistic appreciation of the strengths and weaknesses of their respective claims and contentions.
The Court is of the firm conviction that this case can and should be settled. Otherwise, the parties will likely condemn themselves to endless years of acrimonious, divisive and expensive litigation that will only work to the detriment of higher education in Maryland.
Wherefore, upon due and mature consideration, the Court orders the parties to appear before the Circuit Mediator of this Circuit at the date, time, and place such Mediator shall promptly set, and hereby now refers this matter to mediation before such Circuit Mediator pursuant to Rule 33 of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure and Local Rule 33. The Court further directs counsel to forthwith consult with their clients and obtain as much authority as feasible to settle this case.
The Court further takes this case under submission, pending mediation, and directs that the orders of the district court in this matter shall remain stayed pending further order of this Court.
The parties are advised to proceed in all good faith to reach a mediated settlement to be submitted to this Court. The Circuit Mediator shall report his view of the good faith progress of this mediation every 30 days, to the extent permitted by the confidentiality provision of Rule 33. This mediation shall conclude no later than April 30, 2019 and can only be extended by motion of the Chief Mediator for good cause shown.
It is so ordered.
PER CURIAM:
Referred to the Office of the Circuit Mediator by unpublished per curiam order.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: No. 17-2418 (L)
Decided: January 02, 2019
Court: United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)