Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Darryle Jermaine COOPER, Defendant-Appellant.
Darryle Jermaine Cooper seeks to appeal the district court's order granting his motion to reopen his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion, vacating the judgment previously entered, and denying Cooper's § 2255 motion. When the United States or its officer or agency is a party, the notice of appeal must be filed no more than 60 days after the entry of the district court's final judgment or order, Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1)(B), unless the district court extends the appeal period, Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5), or reopens the appeal period, Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(6). “[T]he timely filing of a notice of appeal in a civil case is a jurisdictional requirement.” Bowles v. Russell, 551 U.S. 205, 214, 127 S.Ct. 2360, 168 L.Ed.2d 96 (2007).
The district court entered the judgment on November 3, 2017, the 60-day appeal period set by Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1)(B) expired on January 2, 2018, and the subsequent 30-day period to file a motion for an extension of time pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5) expired on February 1, 2018. The notice of appeal that Cooper included in his March 1, 2018, motion to vacate judgment was dated November 8, 2017. Although there is no indication when this notice of appeal may have been placed in the institution's internal mail system and it does not include a declaration under 28 U.S.C. § 1746 (2012), a notarized statement, or statement that first class postage was prepaid, see Fed. R. App. P. 4(c)(1), out of an abundance of caution, we remand the case for the limited purpose of allowing the district court to determine whether there is evidence that Cooper placed the notice of appeal dated November 8, 2017, into the internal institutional mail system before the expiration of the appeal period. The record, as supplemented, will then be returned to this court for further consideration.
REMANDED
PER CURIAM:
Remanded by unpublished per curiam opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: No. 18-6212
Decided: August 09, 2018
Court: United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)