Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Quitman ROBINSON v. NEW JERSEY TRANSIT RAIL OPERATIONS, INC.; Jane Doe 1-100 New Jersey Transit Rail Operations, Inc., Appellant
ORDER GRANTING PANEL REHEARING SUA SPONTE AND JUDGMENT ORDER
On January 29, 2019, a panel of this Court (“Panel”) issued a decision (“Decision”) reversing the district court's order of October 19, 2017, that had denied a motion by New Jersey Transit Rail Operations, Inc. (“NJ Transit”) to vacate a judgement entered in favor of Quitman Robinson (“Robinson”) in the amount of $824,152.59. The Panel held that NJ Transit had sovereign immunity from plaintiff's claims that had been brought under the Federal Employers Liability Act, 45 U.S.C. § 51, et seq. (“FELA”). Robinson filed a petition for rehearing and/or rehearing en banc. On March 12, 2019, NJ Transit filed a motion to hold the case is abeyance while the parties discussed a global settlement. By order entered March 15, 2019, the case was held in abeyance.
On June 26, 2019, New Jersey P.L.2019, c. 137 was enacted (“Act”), which provides that NJ Transit may not assert sovereign immunity as a defense to claims arising under certain federal statutes, including FELA. The Act was effective immediately and, by its terms, applies to actions against NJ Transit pending in any court of appeals, which would include this matter. In light of the passage of the Act, NJ Transit no longer possesses sovereign immunity from the claims Robinson has asserted against NJ Transit. Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that panel rehearing in this matter is granted sua sponte. The prior opinion and judgment are hereby VACATED. In light of the action by the panel appellee's petition for rehearing and/or rehearing en banc is dismissed as moot.
It is further ORDERED that the judgment in favor of plaintiff in the amount of $824,152.59 is affirmed by this Court, and the matter is remanded to the district court.
L. Felipe Restrepo, Circuit Judge
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: No. 17-3397
Decided: August 29, 2019
Court: United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)