Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
JOHN PATRICK FLETCHER, Petitioner - Appellant, v. JASON LENGERICH, BVCF Warden; THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF COLORADO, Respondents - Appellees.
ORDER DENYING CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY*
Petitioner John Patrick Fletcher, a Colorado state prisoner appearing pro se, seeks a certificate of appealability (COA) to appeal the district court's denial of his petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(A). In a written order, the district court denied the motion as time-barred under § 2244(d)(1). Because Petitioner has not shown “that jurists of reason would find it debatable whether the petition states a valid claim of the denial of a constitutional right and that jurists of reason would find it debatable whether the district court was correct in its procedural ruling,” we summarily deny Petitioner a COA and dismiss his appeal. Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000).
We need not detail Petitioner's arguments challenging application of § 2244(d)(1)'s one-year limitation period to his petition. Suffice to say we have carefully reviewed his “Combined Opening Brief and Application for a Certificate of Appealability,” the record on appeal, and the district court's written order denying his petition as time-barred. Based on our review, we conclude the district court accurately analyzed the statute of limitations issue and properly dismissed the petition. Where the district court accurately analyzes an issue and articulates a cogent rationale, we see no useful purpose in writing at length. Thus, we reject Petitioner's argument that his petition for a writ of habeas corpus is timely substantially for the reasons set forth in the district court's written order which ably explains why Petitioner is not entitled to a COA.
COA DENIED; APPEAL DISMISSED. Motion for IFP DENIED as moot
Entered for the Court,
Bobby R. Baldock United States Circuit Judge
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: No. 17-1288
Decided: November 13, 2017
Court: United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)