Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
In the Interest of J.J.R.P., A Child
MEMORANDUM OPINION
This is an appeal from a judgment signed April 20, 2016. On September 6, 2016, appellant, Briony Phillipa Pessell, filed a motion to “immediately dismiss proceedings and send the case back to the trial court for the entry of judgment and mandate.”
Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 42.1(a) dictates the options available to a court of appeals concerning voluntary dismissal of a civil appeal. That rule provides in relevant part:
(a) On Motion or By Agreement. The appellate court may dispose of an appeal as follows:
(1) On Motion of Appellant. In accordance with a motion of appellant, the court may dismiss the appeal or affirm the appealed judgment or order unless disposition would prevent a party from seeking relief to which it otherwise may be entitled.
(2) By agreement. In accordance with an agreement signed by the parties or their attorneys and filed with the clerk, the court may:
(A) render judgment effectuating the parties' agreements;
(B) set aside the trial court's judgment without regard to the merits and remand the case to the trial court for rendition of judgment in accordance with the agreements; or
(C) abate the appeal and permit proceedings in the trial court to effectuate the agreement.
Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a).
We are not permitted to both dismiss the appeal and remand the case, which appellant requests. We are limited to the actions authorized by Rule 42.1(a). Here, because dismissal is sought by appellant's motion, not by agreement of the parties, our only options are to dismiss the appeal or affirm the judgment. Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a)(1). Therefore, we GRANT the motion only to the extent it asks for dismissal of the appeal. The appeal is DISMISSED on appellant's motion.
Appellee's motion to dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction is DENIED AS MOOT.
PER CURIAM
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: NO. 14-16-00668-CV
Decided: September 29, 2016
Court: Court of Appeals of Texas, Houston (14th Dist.).
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)