Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
$4,300.00 IN U.S. CURRENCY (DAVID EARL STANLEY), Appellant v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
MEMORANDUM OPINION
The appellant, David Earl Stanley, filed a suggestion of mootness because the trial court signed an order of non-suit for the civil forfeiture proceeding. The State did not contest the suggestion of mootness. The appeal is dismissed as moot without reference to the merits. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3.
APPEAL DISMISSED.
LEANNE JOHNSON Justice
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Docket No: NO. 09-16-00261-CV
Decided: September 29, 2016
Court: Court of Appeals of Texas, Beaumont.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)