Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Jose Francisco Escamilla, Appellant v. The State of Texas, Appellee
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Appellant Jose Francisco Escamilla appeals from the trial court's interlocutory order denying his motion to suppress. The denial of a motion to suppress may not be appealed until after the final judgment is entered. McKown v. State, 915 S.W.2d 160, 161 (Tex.App.—Fort Worth 1996, no pet.); see Apolinar v. State, 820 S.W.2d 792, 794 (Tex.Crim.App.1991) (“The courts of appeals do not have jurisdiction to review interlocutory orders unless that jurisdiction has been expressly granted by law.”). Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal for want of jurisdiction. See Tex.R.App. P. 43.2(f).
REX D. DAVIS, Justice
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Docket No: No. 10-16-00180-CR
Decided: June 22, 2016
Court: Court of Appeals of Texas, Waco.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)