Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Frank Mosqueda, Appellant v. The State of Texas, Appellee
M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N
Frank Mosqueda filed his notice of appeal on October 1, 2012, and his brief was due February 11, 2013, but was never filed. This Court sent an overdue-brief notice to Mosqueda's appointed counsel, who failed to provide any response. We then abated the appeal for a trial court hearing to determine whether Mosqueda wished to prosecute this appeal, whether he was indigent, and whether his appointed counsel had abandoned this appeal. See Tex.R.App. P. 38.8(b)(2), (3). The trial court notified us that Mosqueda has absconded from supervision and that Mosqueda's counsel, who has been unable to locate or communicate with his client, seeks to abandon this appeal. Under the circumstances, we may consider Mosqueda's appeal without a brief. See id. R. 38.8(b)(4) (authorizing appellate court to “consider the appeal without briefs, as justice may require” when appellant in criminal case fails to file brief).
A grand jury indicted Mosqueda for the third-degree felony offense of family-violence assault. See Tex. Penal Code § 22.02(b)(2). Mosqueda waived his right to a jury trial and pled not guilty. At the conclusion of the bench trial, the court convicted Mosqueda of family-violence assault and sentenced him to two years' imprisonment. See id.
Because Mosqueda failed to file a brief, no issues are properly before this court. See Tex.R.App. P. 38.1(f). We have reviewed the record in the interest of justice and found no unassigned fundamental error. See Tex.R.App. P. 38.8(b)(4); Lott v. State, 874 S.W.2d 687, 688 (Tex.Crim.App.1994). Accordingly, we affirm the trial court's judgment of conviction.
Jeff Rose, Justice
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Docket No: NO. 03–12–00653–CR
Decided: June 28, 2013
Court: Court of Appeals of Texas, Austin.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)