Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
MONICA MARIE GAREY, Appellant v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Opinion By Justice Murphy
Monica Marie Garey was convicted, following the adjudication of her guilt, of aggravated assault with a deadly weapon and sentenced to five years' imprisonment. The trial court thereafter granted appellant's motion for new trial.1 See Tex.R.App. P. 21.8(b). The granting of a new trial restores the case to its position before the former trial, and there is no longer a judgment in place. See Tex.R.App. P. 21.9(b); Waller v. State, 931 S.W.2d 640, 643–44 (Tex.App.—Dallas 1996, no pet.). Absent a judgment of conviction, we have no jurisdiction over the appeal. See Waller, 931 S.W.2d at 644.
We dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction.
Tex.R.App. P. 47
120838F.U05
S
Court of AppealsFifth District of Texas at DallasJUDGMENT
MONICA MARIE GAREY, Appellant
No. 05–12–00838–CR V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, AppelleeAppeal from the 282nd Judicial District Court of Dallas County, Texas. (Tr.Ct.No.F09–73157–S).
Opinion delivered by Justice Murphy, Justices FitzGerald and Fillmore participating. Based on the Court's opinion of this date, we DISMISS the appeal for want of jurisdiction.
Judgment entered July 13, 2012
/Mary Murphy/
MARY MURPHY
JUSTICE
FOOTNOTES
FN1. When this Court noted the trial court's order granting appellant's motion for new trial, we directed the parties to file briefs addressing our jurisdiction over the appeal. Appellant responded that she believed the trial court intended to grant the motion for new trial. The State responded that it confirmed with the trial court its intention to grant appellant a new trial.. FN1. When this Court noted the trial court's order granting appellant's motion for new trial, we directed the parties to file briefs addressing our jurisdiction over the appeal. Appellant responded that she believed the trial court intended to grant the motion for new trial. The State responded that it confirmed with the trial court its intention to grant appellant a new trial.
MARY MURPHY JUSTICE
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Docket No: No. 05–12–00838–CR
Decided: July 13, 2012
Court: Court of Appeals of Texas, Dallas.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)