Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Jonathan Barnes, Appellant v. Texas Department of Family and Protective Services, Appellee
M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N
The trial court rendered a default judgment ordering Jonathan Barnes to pay retroactive and current child support to the managing conservator of his biological child. Barnes raises several issues on appeal relating to the propriety of the default judgment, but the Texas Department of Family and Protective Services concedes error on other grounds. We will vacate the judgment and dismiss the cause.
The Department concedes on appeal that Barnes has had no obligation to support the child who is the subject of the appealed order since a Caldwell County district court terminated Barnes's parental rights to that child on January 26, 2004. See Barnes v. Texas Dep't of Protective & Regulatory Servs., No. 03–04–00239–CV (Tex.App.—Austin Mar. 31, 2005, no pet.); In re Minor Children, Cause No. 02–FL–376 (22nd Dist. Ct., Caldwell County, Tex. Jan. 26, 2004) (Order of Termination 1 ); see also Cade v. Stevens, 207 S.W.3d 909, 911 (Tex.App.—Dallas 2006, no pet.) (termination of parental rights terminates parental duties including the duty to provide support in the future). The Department concedes that, even though the Hays County trial court was unaware of the termination of parental rights, that court had no authority to order Barnes to pay retroactive child support for the period beginning December 8, 2004 (when the managing conservator was appointed several months after Barnes's rights were terminated) or future child support. The Department requests that we reverse the child-support order and remand the cause to the Hays County court with instruction to dismiss the cause without prejudice on grounds that Hays County is not the court with continuing, exclusive jurisdiction. See Tex. Fam.Code Ann. § 155.102 (West 2008).
Rather than remand for further proceedings, we vacate the trial court judgment and dismiss cause number 11–0721 from the Hays County district court. See Tex.R.App. P. 43.2(e). We need not address Barnes's issues on appeal because they afford him no greater relief. See id. R. 47.1.
Vacated and Dismissed
FOOTNOTES
FN1. The Department attached to its brief a copy of the Order of Termination signed January 26, 2004. The parties have not disputed its authenticity. We take judicial notice of the Order of Termination.. FN1. The Department attached to its brief a copy of the Order of Termination signed January 26, 2004. The parties have not disputed its authenticity. We take judicial notice of the Order of Termination.
Jeff Rose, Justice
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Docket No: NO. 03–11–00439–CV
Decided: June 01, 2012
Court: Court of Appeals of Texas, Austin.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)