Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Jasmine Charmaine Herndon, Appellant v. Texas Department of Family and Protective Services, Appellee
M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N
After appellant filed her notice of appeal, the clerk's record was filed in this Court on January 7, 2011, and the reporter's record was filed on February 10, 2011. Appellant's appointed counsel filed and was granted two motions for extension of time to file the brief, but on April 4, 2011, the trial court signed an order allowing counsel to withdraw from the case. After appellant failed to respond to our notices related to the cause, we abated the appeal, asking the trial court to hold a hearing to determine whether appellant still wished to pursue the appeal, whether she was indigent, and whether new appellate counsel should be appointed. See Tex.R.App. P. 38.8(a)(2); In re T.V., 8 S.W.3d 448, 449–50 (Tex.App.—Waco 1999, order) (holding that to adequately protect indigent parent's rights in termination case, court should abate appeal to allow trial court to hold hearing to determine issues raised in Tex.R.App. P. 38.8(b)); see also Tex.R.App. P. 38.8(b)(3).
The court has provided a supplemental clerk's record containing an order signed after the requested hearing. The court determined that appellant had abandoned her appeal and found that it was not necessary to appoint new appellate counsel and that appellant had not brought forth any evidence to prove she was indigent. The trial court recommended that the appeal be dismissed.
Appellant has not filed any kind of response to the supplemental clerk's record or to any of our notices, dating back to July 2011. We therefore dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. See Tex.R.App. P. 42.3(b).
David Puryear, Justice
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Docket No: NO. 03–11–00030–CV
Decided: March 13, 2012
Court: Court of Appeals of Texas, Austin.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)