Richard Andrew Wetmore, Appellant v. The State of Texas, Appellee (2011)

Court of Appeals of Texas, Waco.

Richard Andrew Wetmore, Appellant v. The State of Texas, Appellee

No. 10–11–00422–CR

Decided: December 21, 2011

Before Chief Justice Gray, Justice Davis, and Justice Scoggins

MEMORANDUM Opinion

Richard Wetmore attempts to appeal the trial court's denial of his motion to suppress. By letter dated November 8, 2011, the Clerk of this Court notified Wetmore that the appeal was subject to dismissal because it appeared that this Court does not have jurisdiction over the trial court's interlocutory order. See McKown v. State, 915 S.W.2d 160 (Tex.App.Fort Worth 1996, no pet.). The Clerk also warned Wetmore that the appeal would be dismissed unless, within 21 days of the date of the letter, a response was filed showing grounds for continuing the appeal. See Tex.R.App. P. 44.3. Wetmore has not filed a response showing grounds for continuing the appeal.

We do not have jurisdiction to consider Wetmore's interlocutory appeal. McKown v. State, 915 S.W.2d at 161. Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed.

AL SCOGGINS

[CR25]

Justice

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network