Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
TONY EUGENE FRANKLIN, Appellant v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Opinion By Justice Murphy
Tony Eugene Franklin pleaded guilty to two offenses of violating a protective order. On January 19, 2010, the trial judge found appellant guilty and assessed punishment in each case at five years' imprisonment, probated for five years. In cause no. 05–11–01581–CR, the trial judge also assessed a $2000 fine. Appellant did not file motions for new trial or notices of appeal at that time. On October 6, 2011, appellant sent the trial judge a letter stating he wished to appeal his cases. Appellant filed notices of appeal on October 12, 2011. We conclude we lack jurisdiction over the appeals.
To be timely, a notice of appeal must be filed within thirty days of the date the trial court imposes or suspends punishment in open court. See Tex.R.App. P. 26.2(a)(1). Thus, appellant's notices of appeal were due by February 18, 2010. Appellant's October 6, 2011 letter expressing his desire to appeal and his October 12, 2011 notices of appeal are untimely as to the January 19, 2010 sentencing date.1 See Slaton v. State, 981 S.W.2d 208, 210 (Tex.Crim.App.1998) (per curiam). Therefore, we lack jurisdiction over the appeals.
We dismiss the appeals for want of jurisdiction.
FOOTNOTES
FN1. In cause no. 05–11–01581–CR, the trial judge signed an order on November 4, 2011 modifying the conditions of appellant's community supervision. Appellant's October 6, 2011 letter and October 12, 2011 notice of appeal preceded this action. Further, an order modifying probation conditions is not appealable. See Basaldua v. State, 558 S.W.2d 2, 5 (Tex.Crim.App.1977).. FN1. In cause no. 05–11–01581–CR, the trial judge signed an order on November 4, 2011 modifying the conditions of appellant's community supervision. Appellant's October 6, 2011 letter and October 12, 2011 notice of appeal preceded this action. Further, an order modifying probation conditions is not appealable. See Basaldua v. State, 558 S.W.2d 2, 5 (Tex.Crim.App.1977).
MARY MURPHY JUSTICE
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Docket No: No. 05–11–01574–CR
Decided: December 05, 2011
Court: Court of Appeals of Texas, Dallas.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)